Keep in mind, the bracket I am posting here relies on bonus points in the first round (that is, for a 9 beating an 8, it's one bonus point; for an 11 beating a 6 it's 5 bonus points, etc.). By rounds, you get 2-4-6-8-10-12 points.
Sweet 16
(1) North Carolina over (9) Arkansas - Obviously the tough pick here is the Indiana/Arkansas game. I think whoever wins that game is capable of giving UNC a decent game. I went with Arkansas because of the bonus point and because I think Pelphrey is a great young coach while Dakich is in the wrong place at the wrong time.
(4) Washington State over (5) Notre Dame - I just don't see the dogs getting it done here. Wazzou is too disciplined and too well coached to fall to a Winthrop team that is a step down from last year. George Mason is a quality team, but Notre Dame will have too much offensively. Wazzou should advance to Sweet 16.
(3) Louisville over (11) Saint Joe's - I really want to go to Birmingham to watch OU play, but I'm really afraid it's one and done. Getting five bonus points with St. Joe's seems too good to ignore. I've been high on Boise State all year, but I just don't see any of these other three teams keeping Pitino's boys from making the second weekend.
(2) Tennessee over (10) South Alabama - Tennessee could be struggle with this pseudo-road game at USA. The Jaguars are a really good team that I expect to beat Butler relatively easily. Of course, the way Butler can shoot the three and play defense, it's hard to count them out. Still, Tennessee too much for whoever wins the first game.
(1) Kansas over (9) Kent State - I really was looking to advance Kent State to at least the Sweet 16. I love their team and I think Akron's win at FSU tonight proved how strong the top of the MAC was this season. But for me, Kansas is the most talented team in the nation, and should coast to the Elite 8.
(12) Villanova over (4) Vanderbilt - Every year there's that team that people think shouldn't even be in the tournament, and so often that team proves itself by making it to the second weekend. I think that's the case with this Villanova team. I'm not crazy about Clemson - they were a 7 or 8 seed most of the season and beat a mediocre Duke team and played a highly overrated UNC team close and everyone thinks the Tigers are great. I love Stallings and Foster, but Nova really strikes me as a sleeper here.
(6) USC over (14) Cal-State Fullerton - Wisky/CSF is another game where I never pick Fullerton to win without bonus points, but the 11 bonus points are too tempting to ignore here. Wisky was nearly beaten by a Texas A&M Corpus-Christi team in the first round last year. That team wasn't close to this year's CSF team. And, I think SC is primed for a run.
(2) Georgetown over (10) Davidson - I'm afraid Davidson is the en vogue pick that gets crushed in the first round, as seems to happen every year. But this team is very good and is playing very close to home against a team from 3,000 miles away. The Hoyas should get them, but I can make a pretty easy case for Davidson making it to week two.
(1) Memphis over (9) Oregon - Ernie Kent is a horrible in-game coach, but I really believe his Ducks (or Mississippi State, that first-round game is between two teams I wanted to use as sleepers) will give Memphis a great game in the second round. I think the Pac-10 is going to show exceptionally well, they are far and away the best conference in college basketball in my eyes, and an Oregon run to the second weekend would not surprise me a bit.
(5) Michigan State over (13) Oral Roberts - There's just no doubt for me that Michigan State comes out of these four teams. So good news for those of you picking Temple in the first round. I think Pitt is in a precarious situation after the four wins in four days last week, and anything less than 100% against my hometown ORU will result in an upset.
(3) Stanford over (6) Marquette - I think the bottom half of this bracket plays out according to Hoyle. Stanford's big guys are too much to handle, and the team is one of the top five in the nation defensively. I love Gillespie and think UK will be a beast soon, but the Cats are at least a year away. Marquette's guards beat them.
(2) Texas over (7) Miami - Miami's only real problem has been giving up offensive rebounds, I don't envision that being an issue against St. Mary's, and Captain Jack will carry them to enough points. Texas isn't losing to any of these teams.
(1) UCLA over (8) BYU - It's been a while since BYU won a tournament game, but A&M is so bad away from home that I think the Cougs get one this year. I just don't see either team beating UCLA in Anaheim.
(4) UCONN over (12) Western Kentucky - Drake's really good and really well coached, and I won't be surprised to see them in the Sweet 16. But, for me, WKU is one of the best #12 seeds I've ever seen, and - as evidenced by the fact that they are only a four-point dog - it's hard to pass up 7 potential bonus points. UCONN is too strong for them inside though.
(3) Xavier over (11) Baylor - Xavier is really, really good. Somehow, Saint Joe's beat the Musketeers twice in the past couple weeks, but this team is so good at shooting the ball, and they catch Georgia at the perfect time. I think Baylor is another disrespected team that has as much as or more talent than its opponent, and I expect the minor upset here.
(10) Arizona over (2) Duke - So, I really like this WVU team, but I can't pick them to beat the best #10 seed in the history of the tournament. Zona dealt with so much turmoil and so many injuries this season, but the Wildcats are ready to make a run. If they can get by WVU, and I'm gambling that they can, I am quite confident they will beat Duke, who is by far the weakest #2 seed.
ELITE EIGHT
(2) Tennessee over (1) North Carolina - Kind of bland, I know, picking the 1 and 2, but this game wouldn't be bland at all. I think the Vols are the much better defensive team, and their pressure would be enough to bother the hobbled Lawson into enough mistakes for a close Vols win.
(1) Kansas over (6) USC - I hate picking a team that can very well lose in the first round to make it all the way to the Regional Final, but that's the potential I see with SC. Kansas is just too much IMO. Whereas everyone else in the Midwest relies on one or two players, the Jayhawks have five or six guys who can lead the team to victory.
(5) Michigan State over (2) Texas - I really think everyone is counting Izzo's team out, and I just don't see why. I know they weren't consistent this season, but Sparty defends as well as anybody and has one of the best shooters/leaders in the tournament in Neitzel and plenty of capable bodies underneath. Morgan will become nationally known in this tournament. I don't know how Texas can deal with the Lopez Twins, but I see them advancing before losing to Sparty largely because of a horrible coaching mismatch.
(1) UCLA over (10) Arizona - Kind of rash I know, to have a #10 seed in the Elite 8, but when you consider all the underlying factors, the ridiculous strength of schedule, and the fact that the games are in Phoenix, I really think Zona has a shot at the Final Four. However, I just can't go against a team that has the best coach, big man, and point guard in the entire tournament.
Final Four
(1) UCLA over (1) Kansas - I haven't had two #1 seeds in my final game in about a decade, but I think that could be the case this year. I really love UCLA's chances of getting there, and IMO Kansas has been the most impressive team all year. But in the end, I'll almost always go with coaching, and no one is on Howland's level. The Bruins cut down the nets in San Antonio.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Monday, March 3, 2008
New and improved
Upon finding out that our former editor hadn't written his blog in over a month, all the while insisting that ours be up every Monday, Gravette and I were furious. Well, he gone, but the blog marches on under new management.
Should LaPlante be brought back?
Gravette: I honestly think that LaPlante should be offered another contract. In his seven years at JSU, he has definitely proved that he can recruit. If he brings in another Nick Murphy, the Gamecocks could be very dangerous next season.
Yes, JSU was pretty bad this year, but the team was very young. The loss of Dorian Brown also hurt. Without Brown, the Gamecocks lost a lot of experience and senior leadership. I think JSU proved that they can compete late in the season, winning three of their last five games. LaPlante deserves one more season to turn this ship around.
Staubs: That sounds pretty familiar. As I've said all along, I would have had no problem at all with LaPlante being fired after last year. If the team doesn't make the conference tournament next year, whoever is coach should be fired. But this year, the team was never going to win 10 games.
If MLP comes back next season, I expect a 15-20 win season. We'll find out shortly whether he is staying or not (I'm afraid the answer will be not), but I feel that letting him go after this season would be comically bad timing.
Who has been the biggest NFL free agent signee?
Staubs: I really haven't been keeping up with it that much. I really like the Bills acquisition of Marcus Stroud and the Saints' acquisition of Jonathan Vilma, but those came via trade.
I guess, I would have to say the Bucs getting Jeff Faine to be their new center. That was a position that just killed them last year, and it was the major reason the Giants were able to upset them in the first round.
I think the Asante Samuel deal was the latest in a long line of mistakes by Philly. Samuel became overrated because of the system in which he played (remember, Troy Brown looked good as a DB in New England). The biggest signing will be Nnamdi Asomugha. No one knows him because he played in football purgatory in Oakland, but that guy is incredible.
Gravette: In my opinion, it’s the Falcons signing of Michael Turner. He hasn’t got a lot of playing time over the last four years behind LT but proved he could be very dangerous with the ball in his hands. He averaged 4.5 yards per carry last year. Warrick Dunn is old and Jerious Norwood is not an every down back. It’s Turner’s job now.
If the Falcons can draft a good quarterback, things could be looking bright in Atlanta.
What is your favorite sports movie?
Gravette: I love Varsity Blues. I’ve watched it at least 10 times and it never gets old. It’s not your typical underdog story, but who cares. It’s great.
Staubs: You know the saying, "There are no wrong answers"? That doesn't apply here. Good Lord man, Varsity Blues?
For me, it depends on what you consider a sport. Rounders is my favorite movie, and some people consider it a sports movie, but poker isn't a sport. The Color of Money would be my second choice in the category, and most everyone considers it a sports movie, but still ...
Among movies dealing with true sports, I'd have to say it's either Caddyshack or Hoosiers. Both deliver on multiple levels.
Should LaPlante be brought back?
Gravette: I honestly think that LaPlante should be offered another contract. In his seven years at JSU, he has definitely proved that he can recruit. If he brings in another Nick Murphy, the Gamecocks could be very dangerous next season.
Yes, JSU was pretty bad this year, but the team was very young. The loss of Dorian Brown also hurt. Without Brown, the Gamecocks lost a lot of experience and senior leadership. I think JSU proved that they can compete late in the season, winning three of their last five games. LaPlante deserves one more season to turn this ship around.
Staubs: That sounds pretty familiar. As I've said all along, I would have had no problem at all with LaPlante being fired after last year. If the team doesn't make the conference tournament next year, whoever is coach should be fired. But this year, the team was never going to win 10 games.
If MLP comes back next season, I expect a 15-20 win season. We'll find out shortly whether he is staying or not (I'm afraid the answer will be not), but I feel that letting him go after this season would be comically bad timing.
Who has been the biggest NFL free agent signee?
Staubs: I really haven't been keeping up with it that much. I really like the Bills acquisition of Marcus Stroud and the Saints' acquisition of Jonathan Vilma, but those came via trade.
I guess, I would have to say the Bucs getting Jeff Faine to be their new center. That was a position that just killed them last year, and it was the major reason the Giants were able to upset them in the first round.
I think the Asante Samuel deal was the latest in a long line of mistakes by Philly. Samuel became overrated because of the system in which he played (remember, Troy Brown looked good as a DB in New England). The biggest signing will be Nnamdi Asomugha. No one knows him because he played in football purgatory in Oakland, but that guy is incredible.
Gravette: In my opinion, it’s the Falcons signing of Michael Turner. He hasn’t got a lot of playing time over the last four years behind LT but proved he could be very dangerous with the ball in his hands. He averaged 4.5 yards per carry last year. Warrick Dunn is old and Jerious Norwood is not an every down back. It’s Turner’s job now.
If the Falcons can draft a good quarterback, things could be looking bright in Atlanta.
What is your favorite sports movie?
Gravette: I love Varsity Blues. I’ve watched it at least 10 times and it never gets old. It’s not your typical underdog story, but who cares. It’s great.
Staubs: You know the saying, "There are no wrong answers"? That doesn't apply here. Good Lord man, Varsity Blues?
For me, it depends on what you consider a sport. Rounders is my favorite movie, and some people consider it a sports movie, but poker isn't a sport. The Color of Money would be my second choice in the category, and most everyone considers it a sports movie, but still ...
Among movies dealing with true sports, I'd have to say it's either Caddyshack or Hoosiers. Both deliver on multiple levels.
Monday, February 25, 2008
Thoughts while reveling in Tottenham Hotspur's first trophy since 1999
It wasn’t as easy as it might have been, but Spurs won the Carling Cup Sunday, so no matter how much goes wrong this week, it’s been a good one.
To the left is man of the match Jonathan Woodgate, who anchored the defense and scored the game-winner.
Anyway, here's some stuff Gravette and I wrote about.
Do GMs and others put too much stock in the NFL Combine?
Gravette: There is no doubt in my mind that the NFL Combine is rubbish.
Three full days of running 40’s, vertical leaps and bench presses in the weight room. How is that supposed to prove how good of a football player you could be?
I don’t even see any reason for holding the combine. All this talk about whose stock is rising and whose stock is falling. Who cares?
I guess the ‘Golden Boy’, Tom Brady, didn’t do so hot at the combine and look where he is at. Akili Smith must have had a great showing and look where he’s at now.
These people should forget about how fast these kids can run and look at their performance on the field. That is all that should matter.
Staubs: While I fully support the use of the word rubbish, I find it hard to agree with Mr. Gravette on this issue. The importance of the combine might be a bit overstated, but for the relevant teams, the combine can make all the difference.
Impact players can be found at the combine. Good teams find these guys that can help their team right away.
Antonio Cromartie was never going to be a first-round pick until he impressed at the combine last year, and he ended up leading the Chargers to the AFC Championship game despite the numerous injuries the team suffered. The guy will be an elite corner for years to come, and if not for the combine he would have been a late second-round or early third-round pick.
For every major bust, there are plenty of success stories that don’t get as much play from the media or the common fan. The combine works.
Will Mike Bibby take the Hawks to the playoffs?
Staubs: The Hawks now have the players to not only make the playoffs, but to win a series. The problem is that they have a true buffoon on the sidelines.
Down the stretch and (potentially) in the playoffs, Woodson will cost them games. He already has, but because the expectations for the Hawks are so low, he isn’t yet on the hot seat.
The other night, the Hawks were playing a close game against my favorite team, the Utah Jazz (I always loved Stockton, Hornacek, Malone, and Sloan, and have continued to follow the young team currently in place). While sweating the end of the game, there was simply no doubt that the well-coached Jazz would make the plays to win and the poorly-coached Hawks would not.
The Jazz, after trailing most of the game, scored 10 points on their final five possessions – on two lay-ups and six free throws – while the Hawks forced shots and ended up losing by six. If the coaches were reversed … I don’t know that the outcome is the same.
Despite Woodson, the Hawks will probably sneak in to the playoffs, but will be swept by the seasoned Pistons or Cavs in the first round.
Gravette: I’ve always thought the Hawks needed a point guard to do some damage, and they finally got one.
After years of drafting big men over point guards, they settled on Mike Bibby. In my opinion, this would have been a good trade about three years ago when Bibby was considered one of the best in the league, but I haven’t even heard about him this year.
I know he has been hurt and all, but I’m not sure he can play anymore. If the Hawks get to the playoffs, it’s all because of my boy J-Smooth. That kid can play.
Bibby can only help the Hawks, but I don’t see him having a huge impact simply because he can’t stay healthy. So no, the Hawks aren’t going to the playoffs because of Bibby.
Was there a better decision than Keith Van Horn’s to go to New Jersey for over four million dollars?
Gravette: Of course not. This guy may be the smartest person I know. He is going to make over four million dollars by sitting on a bench for a month. Does it get any better than that? Nope. Enough said.
Staubs: Yeah, what a coup he’s pulled here. These Mormon guys are pretty smart. I probably should have supported Romney after all.
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Not as in-depth as Bob Loblaw's Law Blog
All-Star games are horrible.
Whom do you believe, Clemens or McNamee?
Staubs: I find it hard to believe either one. A couple friends and I have basically assumed Clemens was on something for five years. What other explanation was there for him to randomly throw a broken bat at Piazza? But it seemed like a lot of people were surprised when his name was in the Mitchell Report.
I believe Clemens more today than I did before the two men appeared before Congress. McNamee is a total scumbag (not to mention a dead ringer for Andy Dick), and, solely on appearances, totally unbelievable.
Could it be some vendetta McNamee has against him? I don't know. I doubt it, but it's in the realm of possibility.
Realistically, McNamee seems like a worthless human being, and I'm sure he is enjoying the spotlight even in this odd manner, but there must be at least a shred of truth in what he is saying. But I surmise that both are telling half-truths at best.
Gravette: I’m finding it harder and harder to believe anything that Roger Clemens says. If it was just Brian McNamee making these claims, I might give the Rocket a small amount of respect.
But when Andy Pettitte backs him up, I can’t believe a word that he says. These two are supposed to be friends, right? It seems that Pettitte is the bigger man and wants the truth to be told even if it’s ruins a friendship and tarnishes his career.
It’s clear that someone is lying here. With more than one person now having said that Clemens used steroids, it’s hard for me to think that McNamee is not telling the truth.
Is the recent form of the JSU men's basketball team a sign of things to come or a mirage?
Gravette: The men’s basketball team put together back-to-back impressive wins over the weekend, and it appears that next year could be looking a little bit better than expected. Mike LaPlante could have very well saved his job with those victories.
I can’t see anyway that the Gamecocks don’t top six wins when they take the court next season, but I don’t expect JSU to compete for the top spot in the OVC.
They are basically only losing Will Ginn and will have more experience on their side. With that said, I think the future is bright with all the young talent the Gamecocks have, but I still see them finishing under .500 next year.
Staubs: Well, JSU played two teams that are competing to host first round OVC-tournament games, and pretty much handled them. I've been expecting their performances to improve, and I'm buying this team's chances for next year.
I don't think we're talking about OVC champions or anything like that, but I'll be beyond surprised if JSU doesn't qualify for the conference tournament again next season, and I think they have every opportunity to get a top-four seed.
What's the deal with the JSU women's basketball media members not receiving the same perks as the men's media?
Gravette: Staubs enjoys the luxury of covering the men’s basketball games at JSU. The luxury I’m talking about is the free pizza in the media room.
While I do enjoy covering a team that actually wins from time to time, I mostly think about Staubs eating Papa Johns when I leave. It’s a shame. What must I do to get pizza there before the women’s game kicks off? Any ideas Razz 47?
Staubs: Hahaha. I attended my first full women's game this weekend, and frankly, Papa John could feed everyone in the building for about the same price as he feeds the media for the men's games. When I can hear individual conversations taking place across the court - in between the pep band's incessant blaring, of course - well, that's not a pizza-worthy occasion.
Whom do you believe, Clemens or McNamee?
Staubs: I find it hard to believe either one. A couple friends and I have basically assumed Clemens was on something for five years. What other explanation was there for him to randomly throw a broken bat at Piazza? But it seemed like a lot of people were surprised when his name was in the Mitchell Report.
I believe Clemens more today than I did before the two men appeared before Congress. McNamee is a total scumbag (not to mention a dead ringer for Andy Dick), and, solely on appearances, totally unbelievable.
Could it be some vendetta McNamee has against him? I don't know. I doubt it, but it's in the realm of possibility.
Realistically, McNamee seems like a worthless human being, and I'm sure he is enjoying the spotlight even in this odd manner, but there must be at least a shred of truth in what he is saying. But I surmise that both are telling half-truths at best.
Gravette: I’m finding it harder and harder to believe anything that Roger Clemens says. If it was just Brian McNamee making these claims, I might give the Rocket a small amount of respect.
But when Andy Pettitte backs him up, I can’t believe a word that he says. These two are supposed to be friends, right? It seems that Pettitte is the bigger man and wants the truth to be told even if it’s ruins a friendship and tarnishes his career.
It’s clear that someone is lying here. With more than one person now having said that Clemens used steroids, it’s hard for me to think that McNamee is not telling the truth.
Is the recent form of the JSU men's basketball team a sign of things to come or a mirage?
Gravette: The men’s basketball team put together back-to-back impressive wins over the weekend, and it appears that next year could be looking a little bit better than expected. Mike LaPlante could have very well saved his job with those victories.
I can’t see anyway that the Gamecocks don’t top six wins when they take the court next season, but I don’t expect JSU to compete for the top spot in the OVC.
They are basically only losing Will Ginn and will have more experience on their side. With that said, I think the future is bright with all the young talent the Gamecocks have, but I still see them finishing under .500 next year.
Staubs: Well, JSU played two teams that are competing to host first round OVC-tournament games, and pretty much handled them. I've been expecting their performances to improve, and I'm buying this team's chances for next year.
I don't think we're talking about OVC champions or anything like that, but I'll be beyond surprised if JSU doesn't qualify for the conference tournament again next season, and I think they have every opportunity to get a top-four seed.
What's the deal with the JSU women's basketball media members not receiving the same perks as the men's media?
Gravette: Staubs enjoys the luxury of covering the men’s basketball games at JSU. The luxury I’m talking about is the free pizza in the media room.
While I do enjoy covering a team that actually wins from time to time, I mostly think about Staubs eating Papa Johns when I leave. It’s a shame. What must I do to get pizza there before the women’s game kicks off? Any ideas Razz 47?
Staubs: Hahaha. I attended my first full women's game this weekend, and frankly, Papa John could feed everyone in the building for about the same price as he feeds the media for the men's games. When I can hear individual conversations taking place across the court - in between the pep band's incessant blaring, of course - well, that's not a pizza-worthy occasion.
Monday, February 11, 2008
Thoughts while wondering who could possibly find Amy Winehouse appealing in any form or fashion
It's never too early to discuss baseball here at J&J, so here's a couple baseball-related questions and another one.
Who will be the biggest surprise in the AL?
Staubs: The Yankees and Red Sox will be great like they have been all decade. But I'm not convinced both will make the playoffs this season.
Toronto is going to be really, really good. I'd make them the favorite in any other AL division, but the East is soooo stacked.
Now that Schilling isn't in the Red Sox rotation, the Jays have the best rotation in the AL. Obviously it starts with Roy Halladay - the best pitcher in the AL now that Santana is gone - but watch out for Dustin Mcgowan. This guy will win multiple Cy Youngs, and it wouldn't surprise me to see him win 20 games as soon as this season.
Burnett's career numbers are almost identical to Beckett's before last season, and if he can develop consistency and stay healthy ... well, that's the best top three I've seen in years.
Getting Rolen shores up what was already a strong infield defense, which is key because Toronto's staff revolves around ground ball outs.
The bullpen is very strong with two guys who have proven to be dominant closers and the lineup is well above average. If this team stays healthy, it can displace the two perennial powers.
Gravette: My biggest surprise in the American League may not be a surprise at all, but it’s the Angels. Everyone knows they’re good, but I don’t think anyone is picking them to go all the way.
Their pitching staff is solid behind John Lackey and Kelvim Escobar. They added Jon Garland in the off-season to bolster their pitching staff as well.
The biggest move they made, however, was bringing in Torii Hunter. I think he is the piece that puts this team over the top.
The Angels have one of the best bullpens in the league, and they still have Vladimir Guerrero out in right field. Add Hunter and Guerrero to the list of budding youngsters on the roster, and the Angels should be pretty tough to beat.
Staubs: Oh, I thought the question was who will be the biggest surprise in the AL, not who is the favorite. My bad.
Who will be the biggest surprise in the NL?
Gravette: It’s always hard to predict which teams will go from mediocre to great in a span of one year. In the National League, I really like the makeup of the Brew Crew.
Their crop of young players like Ryan Braun, Rickie Weeks and Prince Fielder are only going to get better as time passes. When he is healthy, Ben Sheets is ridiculously good.
I really like some of the moves they made in the off-season as well. They picked up Jason Kendall, Mike Cameron, Jeff Suppan and Eric Gagne which bolsters both their offense and defense. Now that Cameron is out of PETCO, I expect him to have a monster year (after he serves his 25-game suspension of course).
I wouldn’t want to face this lineup. From top to bottom, the Brewers are solid.
Staubs: It's all about pitching for me, and the Giants have as much of it as anyone.
Matt Cain had such incredible bad luck last season - at one point he was 2-12 with an ERA under 3.5 and a WHIP under 1.2 - but that should even out this season.
And I simply cannot say enough about Tim Lincecum. He is the surest thing to come along in baseball in a long time. When you throw 99 and everyone says your fastball is your second best pitch .. well, you're pretty good. Pretty, pretty good.
The Giants also have two quality lefties.
Noah Lowry appeared to turn the corner last year, and the Giants also have Barry Zito, who, if he can regain his form, has proven he can pitch like a Cy Young winner.
Most importantly, the Giants are a perfect Tiki/Ewing Theory candidate (Bill Simmons' term for a term that loses a star player and then performs better the next season). Without the constant hoopla surrounding Bonds, the team will be able to concentrate on baseball more.
The NL West always has a surprise, and I think the Giants can come from nowhere and contend for this division.
Who is the best team in NCAA basketball right now?
Gravette: It’s certainly not Jacksonville State. In my opinion, it’s Duke.
I know that Memphis hasn’t lost a game, but look who they’re playing. When Duke beat North Carolina last week, they proved to me that they were the best team in the country.
They don’t have a superstar, but they do have five players averaging double-figures. It’s that balance that makes them so dangerous.
Their only loss came back in December to Pittsburgh, and they only lost by one point. I expect Duke to go deep into the tournament and possibly even win the national title.
Staubs: I've got to say Kansas, and I don't think it's that close. Tough game tonight, playing another top ten team on the road, but a win seals them as #1 in my mind.
Bill Self isn't a great coach, but he has assembled an impressive collection of talent. The team is experienced and polished, and can beat you from anywhere on the court.
The only other team I would say would be UCLA, who has the best point guard in the nation (with all respect to D.J. Augustine), best big man in the nation (with no respect to Tyler Hansbrough), and the best coach in the nation.
Who will be the biggest surprise in the AL?
Staubs: The Yankees and Red Sox will be great like they have been all decade. But I'm not convinced both will make the playoffs this season.
Toronto is going to be really, really good. I'd make them the favorite in any other AL division, but the East is soooo stacked.
Now that Schilling isn't in the Red Sox rotation, the Jays have the best rotation in the AL. Obviously it starts with Roy Halladay - the best pitcher in the AL now that Santana is gone - but watch out for Dustin Mcgowan. This guy will win multiple Cy Youngs, and it wouldn't surprise me to see him win 20 games as soon as this season.
Burnett's career numbers are almost identical to Beckett's before last season, and if he can develop consistency and stay healthy ... well, that's the best top three I've seen in years.
Getting Rolen shores up what was already a strong infield defense, which is key because Toronto's staff revolves around ground ball outs.
The bullpen is very strong with two guys who have proven to be dominant closers and the lineup is well above average. If this team stays healthy, it can displace the two perennial powers.
Gravette: My biggest surprise in the American League may not be a surprise at all, but it’s the Angels. Everyone knows they’re good, but I don’t think anyone is picking them to go all the way.
Their pitching staff is solid behind John Lackey and Kelvim Escobar. They added Jon Garland in the off-season to bolster their pitching staff as well.
The biggest move they made, however, was bringing in Torii Hunter. I think he is the piece that puts this team over the top.
The Angels have one of the best bullpens in the league, and they still have Vladimir Guerrero out in right field. Add Hunter and Guerrero to the list of budding youngsters on the roster, and the Angels should be pretty tough to beat.
Staubs: Oh, I thought the question was who will be the biggest surprise in the AL, not who is the favorite. My bad.
Who will be the biggest surprise in the NL?
Gravette: It’s always hard to predict which teams will go from mediocre to great in a span of one year. In the National League, I really like the makeup of the Brew Crew.
Their crop of young players like Ryan Braun, Rickie Weeks and Prince Fielder are only going to get better as time passes. When he is healthy, Ben Sheets is ridiculously good.
I really like some of the moves they made in the off-season as well. They picked up Jason Kendall, Mike Cameron, Jeff Suppan and Eric Gagne which bolsters both their offense and defense. Now that Cameron is out of PETCO, I expect him to have a monster year (after he serves his 25-game suspension of course).
I wouldn’t want to face this lineup. From top to bottom, the Brewers are solid.
Staubs: It's all about pitching for me, and the Giants have as much of it as anyone.
Matt Cain had such incredible bad luck last season - at one point he was 2-12 with an ERA under 3.5 and a WHIP under 1.2 - but that should even out this season.
And I simply cannot say enough about Tim Lincecum. He is the surest thing to come along in baseball in a long time. When you throw 99 and everyone says your fastball is your second best pitch .. well, you're pretty good. Pretty, pretty good.
The Giants also have two quality lefties.
Noah Lowry appeared to turn the corner last year, and the Giants also have Barry Zito, who, if he can regain his form, has proven he can pitch like a Cy Young winner.
Most importantly, the Giants are a perfect Tiki/Ewing Theory candidate (Bill Simmons' term for a term that loses a star player and then performs better the next season). Without the constant hoopla surrounding Bonds, the team will be able to concentrate on baseball more.
The NL West always has a surprise, and I think the Giants can come from nowhere and contend for this division.
Who is the best team in NCAA basketball right now?
Gravette: It’s certainly not Jacksonville State. In my opinion, it’s Duke.
I know that Memphis hasn’t lost a game, but look who they’re playing. When Duke beat North Carolina last week, they proved to me that they were the best team in the country.
They don’t have a superstar, but they do have five players averaging double-figures. It’s that balance that makes them so dangerous.
Their only loss came back in December to Pittsburgh, and they only lost by one point. I expect Duke to go deep into the tournament and possibly even win the national title.
Staubs: I've got to say Kansas, and I don't think it's that close. Tough game tonight, playing another top ten team on the road, but a win seals them as #1 in my mind.
Bill Self isn't a great coach, but he has assembled an impressive collection of talent. The team is experienced and polished, and can beat you from anywhere on the court.
The only other team I would say would be UCLA, who has the best point guard in the nation (with all respect to D.J. Augustine), best big man in the nation (with no respect to Tyler Hansbrough), and the best coach in the nation.
Sunday, February 3, 2008
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa?
While trying to figure out what just happened, Gravette and I tackled some burning questions.
What are your final thoughts after Super Bowl XLII?
Gravette: I really enjoyed this one. Not only was it a great game, but the Patriot dream of an undefeated season was shattered.
Nobody thought the Giants stood a chance and they walked away victorious. Maybe the Patriots won’t be so cocky in the future.
The Giants looked like the better team on Sunday night. Their line blocked extremely well, their front seven put pressure on Brady all night, their receivers made big plays when they needed to step up and the didn’t make costly mistakes.
My hat goes off to Eli Manning. He has had to deal with so much criticism throughout his career. He stepped up big time on the biggest stage of them all and showed that he does have what it takes to be successful in the NFL. I’m also happy for Michael Strahan. After being the best defensive end for almost the last decade, he finally won his championship.
The Patriots may have been the better team all year long, but not tonight.
Staubs: Blech. That was a wildly uninteresting football game, and should never be shown on ESPN Classic.
It was nice of Genius Bill Belichick to morph back into Idiot Bill Bellichick (Going for it on 4th and 13 in the first half in lieu of a 48-yard field goal may be the worst coaching decision in "Super" Bowl history). It was nice of Tom Brady and Eli Manning to switch jerseys. And it was especially nice of the Patriots to drop all 10 interceptions Eli tried to throw.
Every time the Patriots brought pressure, Eli threw the ball up for grabs. If the Pats DBs could have caught the ball half the time it was thrown to them, Eli throws five picks. The fact that he won the MVP instead of Strahan or Welker is criminal.
Of course, if Tom Brady doesn’t totally disappear, the Pats still win. For a guy who has made his living and reputation on thriving when it matters most, he pretty much did the opposite. Totally missing receivers, throwing off the back foot needlessly, etc.
I won’t be surprised if it comes out that he needs surgery or something, because something wasn’t right with him. If health wasn’t the problem, that was the worst performance from a regular season MVP in a championship environment since Karl Malone in the late '90s.
Does Spygate tarnish the Patriots dynasty?
Staubs: Again, I would like to remind everyone of my contempt for this term. Every time I hear ___gate, I want to start beating random objects, people, or animals. Nonetheless ...
Gravette: I think it does.
If these developing allegations about taping the Rams walk through prior to the Super Bowl a couple of years back are true, I think the Patriots should be stripped of that title and possibly the others they have won.
If you can’t win without cheating, then don’t even take the field. Maybe Bill Belicheck isn’t that great of a coach after all, unless cheating makes a coach great.
I’m really tired of hearing about Spygate. Does it really matter? It’s in the past, and the Patriots didn’t go undefeated after all. That’s all that matters to me.
Staubs: Before watching the "Super" Bowl, I thought this was a total non-issue. Everybody does it, right?
Well, maybe I was wrong. If Belichick is praised for anything, it’s for his halftime adjustments. Well, I’m still waiting for a halftime adjustment from this game. Or an in-game adjustment. Or anything that admitted, “Hey, what we’re doing isn’t working, so let’s try something else.”
Albert Einstein said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Well, Belichick is insane.
And he’s also a cheater, because I‘m convinced the majority of his coaching adjustments over the years were largely aided by video replay which is illegal in the NFL.
I’m not saying the Patriots should be stripped of their Super Bowls. What good would that do the Rams, Eagles, and/or Panthers? Those victories would be more hollow than playing a basketball game against a team who had its best player hurt, giving them someone with the basketball skills of Helen Keller, and continuing to play 5-on-5.
But - and 99 cases out of 100 I’m violently opposed to this resolution - there should certainly be some kind of asterisk next to that chapter in NFL history.
Do the Braves stand a chance in the NL East after the Mets acquisition of Johan Santana?
Gravette: I don’t think so.
The Mets have arguably the best lineup in the National League. With the addition of Santana, they may also have the best pitching staff in Johan Santana, a healthy Pedro Martinez, John Maine, Orlando Hernandez and Oliver Perez.
As a lifelong Braves fan, I can only hope that Martinez or Santana fail to reach expectations. Without Andrew Jones, the Braves can’t out slug the Mets.
As much as I hate to say it, it looks like another lack-luster third place finish for Atlanta in 2008.
Staubs: This is something I'm really passionate about, for whatever reason. I'm not really a Braves fan, but I like a lot of the players they have amassed, and I think the Jones loss will help in an addition-by-subtraction sort of way (Actually, I have plans to write a column on this in the not too distant future).
I’ll be following with some interest this season. Of course, now that I actually want to watch the Braves every day, TBS goes in another direction. Standard.
Whenever I did catch a Braves game last season, I always walked away thinking what a special player Yunel Escobar is going to be. He does things you just don’t see from any players, let alone young ones.
He is incredible at advancing runners and getting them in without getting a hit. Man on second no outs, he has a knack for hitting the ball the other way - even on an inside pitch - that few can match. While this brought his batting average down to a still impressive .326, it left a larger impression on me.
The only recognition he really got last year, at least from the national media, was when he went to second on a walk. Of course, that was deserved, it was a play you see about once a decade, but he does so much more that goes unseen by most.
Anyway, I’m not going to sit here and write about everyone in the lineup, but it’s a well-above lineup and a well-above average defense.
All you really need from a pitching staff is two dominant starters and three pretty good ones. That’s what the Braves have. Hampton isn’t hurt (yet), and if he can regain anywhere near his prime ability, the Braves’ rotation will be as good as the Mets.
And the bullpen is better. As a left-handed hitter, the guy I would least like to face (other than perhaps Unit, who still scares me) would be Mike Gonzalez. Watching him mow through Victorino, Utley, and Howard last season was enthralling.
There isn’t a liability out there other than Tyler Yates, who is just horrid. He should just be pitching in mop-up roles this season, or hopefully, sent to the minors.
Anyway, Santana’s great, but he went 15-13 with a much better bullpen behind him last season. With the rest of the Mets’ rotation being either old (Pedro), inconsistent (Maine, Perez), or both (El Duque), I don’t rate them that much more highly than the Braves or Phillies. I’d make the Mets the favorite, but I think the East definitely gets two teams in the playoffs, and Atlanta should be one of the two.
What are your final thoughts after Super Bowl XLII?
Gravette: I really enjoyed this one. Not only was it a great game, but the Patriot dream of an undefeated season was shattered.
Nobody thought the Giants stood a chance and they walked away victorious. Maybe the Patriots won’t be so cocky in the future.
The Giants looked like the better team on Sunday night. Their line blocked extremely well, their front seven put pressure on Brady all night, their receivers made big plays when they needed to step up and the didn’t make costly mistakes.
My hat goes off to Eli Manning. He has had to deal with so much criticism throughout his career. He stepped up big time on the biggest stage of them all and showed that he does have what it takes to be successful in the NFL. I’m also happy for Michael Strahan. After being the best defensive end for almost the last decade, he finally won his championship.
The Patriots may have been the better team all year long, but not tonight.
Staubs: Blech. That was a wildly uninteresting football game, and should never be shown on ESPN Classic.
It was nice of Genius Bill Belichick to morph back into Idiot Bill Bellichick (Going for it on 4th and 13 in the first half in lieu of a 48-yard field goal may be the worst coaching decision in "Super" Bowl history). It was nice of Tom Brady and Eli Manning to switch jerseys. And it was especially nice of the Patriots to drop all 10 interceptions Eli tried to throw.
Every time the Patriots brought pressure, Eli threw the ball up for grabs. If the Pats DBs could have caught the ball half the time it was thrown to them, Eli throws five picks. The fact that he won the MVP instead of Strahan or Welker is criminal.
Of course, if Tom Brady doesn’t totally disappear, the Pats still win. For a guy who has made his living and reputation on thriving when it matters most, he pretty much did the opposite. Totally missing receivers, throwing off the back foot needlessly, etc.
I won’t be surprised if it comes out that he needs surgery or something, because something wasn’t right with him. If health wasn’t the problem, that was the worst performance from a regular season MVP in a championship environment since Karl Malone in the late '90s.
Does Spygate tarnish the Patriots dynasty?
Staubs: Again, I would like to remind everyone of my contempt for this term. Every time I hear ___gate, I want to start beating random objects, people, or animals. Nonetheless ...
Gravette: I think it does.
If these developing allegations about taping the Rams walk through prior to the Super Bowl a couple of years back are true, I think the Patriots should be stripped of that title and possibly the others they have won.
If you can’t win without cheating, then don’t even take the field. Maybe Bill Belicheck isn’t that great of a coach after all, unless cheating makes a coach great.
I’m really tired of hearing about Spygate. Does it really matter? It’s in the past, and the Patriots didn’t go undefeated after all. That’s all that matters to me.
Staubs: Before watching the "Super" Bowl, I thought this was a total non-issue. Everybody does it, right?
Well, maybe I was wrong. If Belichick is praised for anything, it’s for his halftime adjustments. Well, I’m still waiting for a halftime adjustment from this game. Or an in-game adjustment. Or anything that admitted, “Hey, what we’re doing isn’t working, so let’s try something else.”
Albert Einstein said that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Well, Belichick is insane.
And he’s also a cheater, because I‘m convinced the majority of his coaching adjustments over the years were largely aided by video replay which is illegal in the NFL.
I’m not saying the Patriots should be stripped of their Super Bowls. What good would that do the Rams, Eagles, and/or Panthers? Those victories would be more hollow than playing a basketball game against a team who had its best player hurt, giving them someone with the basketball skills of Helen Keller, and continuing to play 5-on-5.
But - and 99 cases out of 100 I’m violently opposed to this resolution - there should certainly be some kind of asterisk next to that chapter in NFL history.
Do the Braves stand a chance in the NL East after the Mets acquisition of Johan Santana?
Gravette: I don’t think so.
The Mets have arguably the best lineup in the National League. With the addition of Santana, they may also have the best pitching staff in Johan Santana, a healthy Pedro Martinez, John Maine, Orlando Hernandez and Oliver Perez.
As a lifelong Braves fan, I can only hope that Martinez or Santana fail to reach expectations. Without Andrew Jones, the Braves can’t out slug the Mets.
As much as I hate to say it, it looks like another lack-luster third place finish for Atlanta in 2008.
Staubs: This is something I'm really passionate about, for whatever reason. I'm not really a Braves fan, but I like a lot of the players they have amassed, and I think the Jones loss will help in an addition-by-subtraction sort of way (Actually, I have plans to write a column on this in the not too distant future).
I’ll be following with some interest this season. Of course, now that I actually want to watch the Braves every day, TBS goes in another direction. Standard.
Whenever I did catch a Braves game last season, I always walked away thinking what a special player Yunel Escobar is going to be. He does things you just don’t see from any players, let alone young ones.
He is incredible at advancing runners and getting them in without getting a hit. Man on second no outs, he has a knack for hitting the ball the other way - even on an inside pitch - that few can match. While this brought his batting average down to a still impressive .326, it left a larger impression on me.
The only recognition he really got last year, at least from the national media, was when he went to second on a walk. Of course, that was deserved, it was a play you see about once a decade, but he does so much more that goes unseen by most.
Anyway, I’m not going to sit here and write about everyone in the lineup, but it’s a well-above lineup and a well-above average defense.
All you really need from a pitching staff is two dominant starters and three pretty good ones. That’s what the Braves have. Hampton isn’t hurt (yet), and if he can regain anywhere near his prime ability, the Braves’ rotation will be as good as the Mets.
And the bullpen is better. As a left-handed hitter, the guy I would least like to face (other than perhaps Unit, who still scares me) would be Mike Gonzalez. Watching him mow through Victorino, Utley, and Howard last season was enthralling.
There isn’t a liability out there other than Tyler Yates, who is just horrid. He should just be pitching in mop-up roles this season, or hopefully, sent to the minors.
Anyway, Santana’s great, but he went 15-13 with a much better bullpen behind him last season. With the rest of the Mets’ rotation being either old (Pedro), inconsistent (Maine, Perez), or both (El Duque), I don’t rate them that much more highly than the Braves or Phillies. I’d make the Mets the favorite, but I think the East definitely gets two teams in the playoffs, and Atlanta should be one of the two.
Sunday, January 27, 2008
Super Bowl Preview (sort of) and more
Three questions, answered by Jared and Jered from The Chanticleer:
Who is more dislikable, the Patriots or Giants? Also, give a prediction for the game.
Staubs: Similar to the presidential election that will soon be contested in this country, the Super Bowl is - for me, at least - a matter of hoping for the lesser of two evils.
I can’t stand Boston fans - expect a column on that sometime in February - and I like rooting for the underdog. But I’d root for the Taliban against the Giants.
OK, that was probably in bad taste, considering the Giants’ location. Oh wait, they don’t actually play in New York. That would make too much sense. (How does Artie Moreno get crucified for calling his team the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, and New Jersey doesn’t even campaign for the Giants to be called the New York Giants of New Jersey?)
But here’s the thing. I couldn’t root for this guy under any circumstances. I still can’t forgive him for the total weasel-move he pulled on the Chargers a couple years ago.
I love that the Chargers have been better than the Giants every year since, including this year. Meanwhile, Archie is Richard Williams-level unlikable.
Peyton has personality. I don’t like the Colts, but I was happy for Peyton when he won the Super Bowl last year.
You can tell Peyton wouldn’t be the guy who wanted to come back from Vegas a day early because he's out $500. Eli's that guy. His interviews are horrible, and sometimes I wonder if his dad is holding up cue cards.
The only guy I even remotely liked on the Giants was Shockey, and he’s hurt. He’ll be missed against the Patriots, because a big-time TE is one of the few ways to exploit them.
Anyway, the teams who have proven to be great over the course of a season - 1985 Bears, 1990 Niners, mid-90’s Cowboys - have made statements when playing an obviously inferior team in the Super Bowl. I expect nothing less from the Pats here, especially now that there is no reason to save anything.
A couple Manning mistakes, the fact that Bellichick doesn't lose with an extra week of preparation (or any other time really), and I can see this one being over really early. The 4th quarter will only matter to those playing square boards.
41-14 New England.
Gravette: This is an easy question for me to answer. It's the Patriots. First of all, they are undefeated and have won the Super Bowl three times in the last six years. Nobody likes that kind of dominance. It's boring.
Second of all, they cheat. Does anybody remember Spygate? All I hear about is the pursuit of perfection. That's garbage. They should have had to forfeit their week one contest against the Jets.
But the biggest reason that the Pats are more dislikable, for me, is Tom Brady. He acts like the world owes him something because he was the 199th player taken in the draft. We all know you're good Tom, but why do you have to be so cocky?
As for my prediction of who will win the Super Bowl, I am going with the G-Men in a close one.
34-31.
Staubs: There should be a special layer of hell for people who use the term ____gate. C'mon, Gravette. You're better than that. And Tom Brady's ratio of cockiness to deserved cockiness (where Freddie Mitchell checks in at a perfect 10 and John Stockton is a 1) is about a 2.5. If I had accomplished what he has (on and off the field), I'd probably get tennis elbow from patting myself on the back.
Oh, one other thing. It’s high comedy that only 59.5 percent of espn.com voters are picking the Patriots to win this game. Umm, they’re 18-0 and played their toughest two playoff games the past two weeks, winning both without too much trouble.
Now they’re supposed to stumble against the Giants, because New York fluked a couple wins over highly flawed teams from a greatly inferior conference? Yeah, OK.
Which new Texas coordinator will be more greatly missed by their former Alabama school?
Staubs: I’ll give you an actual quote from my friend who attends the University of Alabama.
“As a student at the university, I haven’t talked to one person who was upset with the departure of Major Applewhite.”
As we all know, anyone who likes the University of Alabama is incompetent, and therefore the very opposite of an expert on the subject.
But seriously, here’s the thing. Muschamp was a quality defensive coordinator. He’ll do fine at Texas. But there was no noticeable difference in his defenses and Chizik’s, and this Paul Rhoads will pick up where he left off.
Actually, considering Pitt’s joke of an offense last year, the work Rhoads did with that defense may have been as impressive as what any coordinator did with their respective unit.
Anyway, Applewhite is the real deal. His creative genius was hampered by the fact that both he and Saban were (rightly) petrified of putting the game in JPW’s hands.
But look what he did at Rice, when he actually had a QB with the talent to start at a Division-I school.
You say, “But that was at Rice.” Yeah, it was. But here’s the thing. In 2005, Rice went 1-10 and scored 241 points. In 2006, Applewhite was there. He took an option offense and turned Chase Clement - drafted as more of a running QB - into one of the most efficient passing QBs in the nation.
Oh yeah, Dillard became an All-American and Rice went to a bowl game for the first time since 1961.
As an Oklahoma fan, I’m legitimately terrified of the Applewhite Era (assuming he eventually becomes OC, which I would assume is a mortal lock). Luckily, Mack Brown - and hopefully, his idiot stepson - will still be on the sidelines screwing things up.
Which brings me to a larger point … how could Applewhite go coach for the guy who stabbed him in the back when he played there? Truly amazing.
Gravette: I'm going to argue that Will Muschamp will be sorely missed by the Auburn Tigers. During his two seasons as defensive coordinator on the Plains, Muschamp's defense was one of the best in the country.
In 2006, the Tigers ranked seventh nationally in scoring defense. In 2007, Auburn ranked sixth in the same category.
Against Arkansas, the Tigers held the nation's top running back, Darren McFadden, to only 43 yards.
As for Applewhite, I'm glad to see him go. I'm an Alabama fan, and I was getting pretty fed up with Applewhite calling running plays on first and second down only to have to pass on third and long. He was too predictable.
Should the word "Super" be inserted/re-inserted in front of the San Diego Chargers and Seattle Sonics' team names?
Gravette: I'm going to answer this question a little differently. With the Chargers, it's a yes for me. Just to hear Chris Berman say, "San Diego Super Chargers" makes my day that much better.
Plus the Chargers do have LaDainian Tomlinson, Antonio Gates, and Shawne Merriman. In my opinion, these three are the best in football at their respective positions.
They are nothing short of super.
As for the Sonics, there is nothing super about them. Other than Kevin Durant, they've got nothing.
Staubs: I literally have nothing to add.
Who is more dislikable, the Patriots or Giants? Also, give a prediction for the game.
Staubs: Similar to the presidential election that will soon be contested in this country, the Super Bowl is - for me, at least - a matter of hoping for the lesser of two evils.
I can’t stand Boston fans - expect a column on that sometime in February - and I like rooting for the underdog. But I’d root for the Taliban against the Giants.
OK, that was probably in bad taste, considering the Giants’ location. Oh wait, they don’t actually play in New York. That would make too much sense. (How does Artie Moreno get crucified for calling his team the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, and New Jersey doesn’t even campaign for the Giants to be called the New York Giants of New Jersey?)
But here’s the thing. I couldn’t root for this guy under any circumstances. I still can’t forgive him for the total weasel-move he pulled on the Chargers a couple years ago.
I love that the Chargers have been better than the Giants every year since, including this year. Meanwhile, Archie is Richard Williams-level unlikable.
Peyton has personality. I don’t like the Colts, but I was happy for Peyton when he won the Super Bowl last year.
You can tell Peyton wouldn’t be the guy who wanted to come back from Vegas a day early because he's out $500. Eli's that guy. His interviews are horrible, and sometimes I wonder if his dad is holding up cue cards.
The only guy I even remotely liked on the Giants was Shockey, and he’s hurt. He’ll be missed against the Patriots, because a big-time TE is one of the few ways to exploit them.
Anyway, the teams who have proven to be great over the course of a season - 1985 Bears, 1990 Niners, mid-90’s Cowboys - have made statements when playing an obviously inferior team in the Super Bowl. I expect nothing less from the Pats here, especially now that there is no reason to save anything.
A couple Manning mistakes, the fact that Bellichick doesn't lose with an extra week of preparation (or any other time really), and I can see this one being over really early. The 4th quarter will only matter to those playing square boards.
41-14 New England.
Gravette: This is an easy question for me to answer. It's the Patriots. First of all, they are undefeated and have won the Super Bowl three times in the last six years. Nobody likes that kind of dominance. It's boring.
Second of all, they cheat. Does anybody remember Spygate? All I hear about is the pursuit of perfection. That's garbage. They should have had to forfeit their week one contest against the Jets.
But the biggest reason that the Pats are more dislikable, for me, is Tom Brady. He acts like the world owes him something because he was the 199th player taken in the draft. We all know you're good Tom, but why do you have to be so cocky?
As for my prediction of who will win the Super Bowl, I am going with the G-Men in a close one.
34-31.
Staubs: There should be a special layer of hell for people who use the term ____gate. C'mon, Gravette. You're better than that. And Tom Brady's ratio of cockiness to deserved cockiness (where Freddie Mitchell checks in at a perfect 10 and John Stockton is a 1) is about a 2.5. If I had accomplished what he has (on and off the field), I'd probably get tennis elbow from patting myself on the back.
Oh, one other thing. It’s high comedy that only 59.5 percent of espn.com voters are picking the Patriots to win this game. Umm, they’re 18-0 and played their toughest two playoff games the past two weeks, winning both without too much trouble.
Now they’re supposed to stumble against the Giants, because New York fluked a couple wins over highly flawed teams from a greatly inferior conference? Yeah, OK.
Which new Texas coordinator will be more greatly missed by their former Alabama school?
Staubs: I’ll give you an actual quote from my friend who attends the University of Alabama.
“As a student at the university, I haven’t talked to one person who was upset with the departure of Major Applewhite.”
As we all know, anyone who likes the University of Alabama is incompetent, and therefore the very opposite of an expert on the subject.
But seriously, here’s the thing. Muschamp was a quality defensive coordinator. He’ll do fine at Texas. But there was no noticeable difference in his defenses and Chizik’s, and this Paul Rhoads will pick up where he left off.
Actually, considering Pitt’s joke of an offense last year, the work Rhoads did with that defense may have been as impressive as what any coordinator did with their respective unit.
Anyway, Applewhite is the real deal. His creative genius was hampered by the fact that both he and Saban were (rightly) petrified of putting the game in JPW’s hands.
But look what he did at Rice, when he actually had a QB with the talent to start at a Division-I school.
You say, “But that was at Rice.” Yeah, it was. But here’s the thing. In 2005, Rice went 1-10 and scored 241 points. In 2006, Applewhite was there. He took an option offense and turned Chase Clement - drafted as more of a running QB - into one of the most efficient passing QBs in the nation.
Oh yeah, Dillard became an All-American and Rice went to a bowl game for the first time since 1961.
As an Oklahoma fan, I’m legitimately terrified of the Applewhite Era (assuming he eventually becomes OC, which I would assume is a mortal lock). Luckily, Mack Brown - and hopefully, his idiot stepson - will still be on the sidelines screwing things up.
Which brings me to a larger point … how could Applewhite go coach for the guy who stabbed him in the back when he played there? Truly amazing.
Gravette: I'm going to argue that Will Muschamp will be sorely missed by the Auburn Tigers. During his two seasons as defensive coordinator on the Plains, Muschamp's defense was one of the best in the country.
In 2006, the Tigers ranked seventh nationally in scoring defense. In 2007, Auburn ranked sixth in the same category.
Against Arkansas, the Tigers held the nation's top running back, Darren McFadden, to only 43 yards.
As for Applewhite, I'm glad to see him go. I'm an Alabama fan, and I was getting pretty fed up with Applewhite calling running plays on first and second down only to have to pass on third and long. He was too predictable.
Should the word "Super" be inserted/re-inserted in front of the San Diego Chargers and Seattle Sonics' team names?
Gravette: I'm going to answer this question a little differently. With the Chargers, it's a yes for me. Just to hear Chris Berman say, "San Diego Super Chargers" makes my day that much better.
Plus the Chargers do have LaDainian Tomlinson, Antonio Gates, and Shawne Merriman. In my opinion, these three are the best in football at their respective positions.
They are nothing short of super.
As for the Sonics, there is nothing super about them. Other than Kevin Durant, they've got nothing.
Staubs: I literally have nothing to add.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
